Direct Answer
Project systems in construction stand on the work breakdown structure. We build project, task, labour, material and cost records against one WBS so site progress and cost consumption can be compared against the plan instead of estimated at month end.
Suitable For
- Contractors needing project progress, labour and material tracking across sites
- Engineering firms needing task assignment, document versions and acceptance records
- Installation and maintenance teams needing dispatch, site reports and photo evidence
Not Suitable For
- Structural or CAD computation requiring specialist engineering software
- Statutory safety filing that must run in a government-mandated platform
Core modules and the data each one owns
| Module | Scope, data and rules it owns |
|---|---|
| Project & WBS | Project, phase, work package and task tree with planned dates, quantity and budget per node. |
| Progress reporting | Site-reported quantity completed per work package with photo evidence and reviewer approval before it counts toward progress. |
| Labour & attendance | Worker roster, subcontractor crews, site attendance and the basis for labour cost allocation. |
| Material | Material requisition, delivery receipt, site consumption and variance against the planned quantity. |
| Cost | Committed and actual cost per work package versus budget, with the drill-down needed to explain a variance. |
| Document & acceptance | Drawing and document versions, change notices, inspection and acceptance records with signature capture. |
Step-by-step Process
- Send the current workflow, the roles involved and where the process breaks down today
- We map the data model, the modules needed at launch and what can wait for a later phase
- Confirm scope, integrations, acceptance criteria, source-code ownership and deployment responsibility
- Iterative build with demos at each milestone, then functional, compatibility and performance testing
- Deployment, source-code and documentation handover, then an agreed maintenance path
Buyer Checklist
- One primary user workflow and one admin workflow defined for the first release
- Role and permission matrix agreed before development, enforced in the backend
- Integration accounts and API credentials confirmed as available
- Data migration source, format and volume reviewed
- Acceptance criteria written per module, not per screen
- Source-code ownership, deployment responsibility and maintenance scope stated in the contract
Information Needed for Quotation
- The workflow you want to replace or build, and who performs each step
- User roles and what each role may see and edit
- Platforms required at launch (web, mini program, iOS, Android, desktop)
- Systems to integrate: payment, ERP, WMS, hardware, accounting, third-party APIs
- Existing data to migrate, its current format and rough volume
- Whether source-code handover and self-hosting are required
Frequently Asked Questions
Can site staff report without a stable connection?
Yes. The mobile app caches reports and photos locally with capture time and location, then uploads when connectivity returns. This is close to mandatory for remote sites and should be in scope from the start.
Can we compare actual cost against budget in real time?
As real-time as the input allows. Once labour, material and subcontract records are captured against work packages, the comparison is automatic — the constraint is discipline in site reporting, not the software.
Which platforms do you build for this industry?
Web system for the office and project managers, Android and iOS app for site reporting with offline photo capture and GPS stamping, plus an admin panel for multi-project oversight.
What can you integrate with?
Map and location services for site verification; cloud storage for drawings; e-signature for acceptance; accounting export; attendance hardware where the vendor exposes an API.
Will we own the source code?
Source-code handover, repository access, deployment notes and database documentation can be included in the agreed scope. State it in the brief so it is priced in rather than added later.
Can you take over an existing system instead of rebuilding?
Yes. We start with a code and environment review, then propose a scoped plan for bug fixes, refactoring, UI rework or new features. Rebuilding is only recommended when the review shows the existing codebase cannot carry the roadmap.
Related Pages
Request a Quotation
Include the fields listed above so the response can focus on model, material, fitment or service scope instead of generic claims.
Request a Project Estimate
Tell us about the product goal, current workflow, target platform, constraints and decision timeline. We will review the scope and recommend a practical next step.